|
xiaoxiao (2003-09-27 22:05:33)
有朋友去看了阿伊达的吗? 评论一下 明天想去看看
Bjorling (2003-09-27 23:44:39)
刚看完AIDA回来，总的感觉是不爽，太多的失望！
不过，到7点左右，黄牛的票价跌到了10元！
nimo (2003-09-28 09:28:59)
从电视新闻看简直就是一场闹剧,最多是一次大型的体育盛会.那个作为歌剧的东西似乎完全让步给了所谓"现代豪华文化大餐"的需要.
上海玩了一次还不够,北京又拾人牙秽.可悲!
勇敢的心 (2003-09-28 10:43:38)
这玩意，这里不会有朋友掏钱买票去看吧？
感冒 (2003-09-28 11:05:25)
什么玩意儿！体育场改斗兽场了！还不如去国图听国交的音乐会呢！昨晚可是爆满！
也许有点绝对 (2003-09-28 18:08:46)
上次看《图兰多》给我的教训……所以毫不犹豫地不去看《阿伊达》，宣传得越热烈越不能去。 下面是我正在写的一个东东的片段：
轰轰烈烈的法国大歌剧时代之后，几乎所有的评论家都对之持批评态度，他们认为法国大歌剧“迎合涌往歌剧院寻求刺激和娱乐的、相对来说修养不高的听众的口味”，是用夸张的气氛渲染来遮盖内容的苍白，是“假繁荣”，实际上只不过商业化的大制作。
《阿伊达》本身绝对是杰作，但会被辉煌得苍白无比，为了尊重威尔第大师，有条件的去正经歌剧院，每条件的还是看录像比较好。:(
齐格 (2003-09-29 00:41:43)
可视为行为艺术的一种。
索性排熟练后让舟舟站在最高点进行指挥，下面上万个演员、观众都跟着他的意识流而动…………
遥想猫猫当年，群鼠齐呼万岁！
xiaoxiao (2003-09-29 00:53:22)
上半场的车水马龙过后观众走了一半
下半场看得很投入
donjuan (2003-09-29 01:01:03)
Just saw a few photos of the show from the other Forum. Visually
speaking, it's not bad at all. I hope they have managed to
film it. As for the singing and the sound effect, don't worry,
people can use as many studio recording as possible later
on. This tryout may not be for typical Opera lovers only,
but if it is directed cohesively enough, with its grandiose
scene, maybe it can be made into a nice Opera movie. I don't
know how many people here have seen the movie version of "Lady
Macbeth of the Mtsensk", the whole music and singing are done
in studio, although I haven't checked in detail whether it's
the same one as Rostro's EMI CD release. Anyway, aside of
a few graphical sex scenes, which may or may not offend some
hypercritics, that one is not a bad movie at all. Even though
the leading actress can't sing herself, but at least she is
pretty and seductive enough to make the story looks kind of
real, otherwise, if substitute her with a gigantic fat lady
who CAN sing, guys may long lost their appetites, let alone
been seduced. ^c^
donjuan (2003-09-29 01:05:24)
"Hypercritics" ? Well, may be to certain extend, but I did
mean "Hypocrites" here.
xiaoxiao (2003-09-29 01:26:09) http://www.junmeng.org/upload/upfile/2003929058200.jpg
http://www.junmeng.org/upload/upfile/2003929109570.jpg
问问 (2003-09-29 08:44:04)
歌剧是听的还是看的？
如果是听的，那么这种破烂大制作，拿麦克风糊弄人，这么贵的票价去听音响，纯粹是浪费钱。要听我就要听剧场里面的真正的人声，听音响我不如买CD、DVD听听那些最大牌的歌唱家。
如果是看的，那么到底歌剧的意义何在？
donjuan (2003-09-29 09:25:50)
What a silly question! Of course Opera is to be Seen as well
as Heard! Before the invention of gramophone, people can only
access it through piano transcription at home, otherwise,
they have to go to the Opera house . During 19th century,
Opera was kind of like Movie today! Well, don't get me wrong,
I knew how bad the sound would be. But even it's played in
a stadium, carefully prepared acoustic, still can serve the
purpose at the minimum. The reason I like somebody bold enough
to try out something new, something grandiose, is that the
story does need it. Meanwhile, the plot also needs a smaller,
a more intimated atmosphere, (if you are familiar enough to
Aida, you should know what/when/where I mean), therefore I
said a movie version could be kind of optimum. You can cover
both extreme conditions, while pre/post recorded music/singing
can also solve the acoustic problem. As long as the play is
cohesive, I think it will doing fine. Let repeat it again,
cohesive, that's the key word, which is what Turandot at the
Forbidden City lacks the most.
美成 (2003-09-29 09:42:47)
The tragedy is, a luxury feast of vision submerges music
itself. Aida, a disaster!
donjuan (2003-09-29 10:01:34)
Wow, this bad? No medicine to cure? :-)
|
